Prioritising future savings versus immediate enjoyment: agree or disagree
The question
People should save money for the future instead of spending it on enjoyment now. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
About 40 minutes. Write at least 250 words.
Plan before you write
- Position:
- I strongly agree that individuals should prioritise long-term financial security over immediate gratification to ensure stability and preparedness.
- Paragraph 2:
- Saving money provides a necessary safety net against unforeseen economic hardships or personal emergencies.
- Paragraph 3:
- Delayed gratification fosters long-term financial freedom, allowing for significant investments that improve quality of life later.
- State a clear position in the last sentence of the introduction and keep it to the end.
- Two body paragraphs that each give one reason for that position, with an example.
- A partial position is fine if it is stated precisely; a position that drifts is what caps task response at 6.
Band 8 sample essay
The debate regarding whether people should accumulate wealth for the future or allocate their earnings towards current pleasures is a perennial topic. While some argue that living for the moment is essential for mental wellbeing, I strongly agree that prioritising long-term financial security is more prudent to ensure stability and future preparedness.
Building a robust financial reserve serves as a vital buffer against the unpredictability of life. Unforeseen circumstances, such as sudden redundancy, medical emergencies, or global economic downturns, can devastate those who live entirely beyond their means. By consistently setting aside a portion of one’s income, individuals create a safety net that mitigates the risk of debt and reliance on external assistance. For instance, families that maintain an emergency fund are significantly better positioned to navigate periods of unemployment without compromising their basic living standards or incurring high-interest loans.
Furthermore, the practice of delayed gratification facilitates substantial long-term investments that enhance one’s quality of life far more than transient luxuries. Redirecting funds from impulsive consumption towards vehicles like pension schemes, property investments, or professional development creates compound growth that sustains a person well into retirement. Consider a young professional who chooses to invest in further education or a diversified portfolio rather than expensive holidays; such a decision often yields long-term career advancement and financial independence, providing far more lasting satisfaction than fleeting experiences. This disciplined approach transforms modest savings into substantial assets over several decades.
In summary, while immediate enjoyment offers temporary satisfaction, the benefits of saving for the future are far more significant. Establishing financial resilience and investing in long-term goals are superior strategies for achieving lasting peace of mind. Consequently, individuals should adopt a balanced approach that favours fiscal responsibility to secure their future wellbeing.
288 words. Use the structure and the vocabulary, not the sentences.
Why this scores Band 8
The essay achieves Band 8 by consistently addressing the prompt with a clear, well-supported argument and sophisticated vocabulary. A Band 6 response often fails to provide specific examples and relies on repetitive, simplistic language rather than developing a coherent, logical progression of ideas.
Vocabulary from the essay
- perennial
- lasting for a very long time or recurring
- prudent
- acting with or showing care for the future
- redundancy
- the state of being no longer needed professionally
- mitigates
- makes something less severe, serious, or painful
- delayed gratification
- resisting immediate reward for a greater later gain
- transient
- lasting only for a short period of time
- compound growth
- earnings growing from both principal and accumulated interest
- fiscal responsibility
- the practice of managing money with careful planning
Write this one yourself and get a band
Forty minutes, then a band for task response, coherence, vocabulary and grammar, with the sentences that cost you marked.
Practise IELTS writingOn your phone? Get the BandLadder app for scored writing practice anywhere.
Frequently asked questions
What type of essay is "Prioritising future savings versus immediate enjoyment: agree or disagree"?
Opinion (agree or disagree). State a clear position in the last sentence of the introduction and keep it to the end.
How long should the answer be?
At least 250 words. This sample is 288 words, written to fit 40 minutes with five minutes left to check grammar.
What is the difference between a Band 6 and a Band 8 answer here?
The essay achieves Band 8 by consistently addressing the prompt with a clear, well-supported argument and sophisticated vocabulary. A Band 6 response often fails to provide specific examples and relies on repetitive, simplistic language rather than developing a coherent, logical progression of ideas.
More sample essays
- Credit cards versus cash: advantages and disadvantages analysed
- Financial aid for developing nations: to what extent
- High salaries for professional athletes: discuss both views
- Online shopping versus physical stores: discuss both views
- Online versus physical retail: discuss both views
- Addressing the rising problem of cyberbullying among teenagers
- Are traditional museums and galleries obsolete in digital times?
- Are video games beneficial for children: agree or disagree
- All 148 sample essays