Reading passage
How Humans Navigate by Smell
Skip to the questions ↓For well over a century, conventional scientific wisdom relegated the human sense of smell to an evolutionary afterthought. Nineteenth-century anatomists observed that the human olfactory bulb occupies a vastly smaller proportion of the brain than that of rodents or canines, concluding that our ancestors had traded olfactory acuity for trichromatic colour vision and high-level cognitive processing. This assumption persisted throughout much of the twentieth century, reinforced by the belief that humans rarely use airborne chemical cues to guide their everyday movements. However, a growing body of contemporary research is fundamentally overturning this view. Far from being sensory relics, human olfactory faculties are surprisingly sophisticated, capable of discerning trillions of distinct odour molecules and playing an unexpectedly active role in environmental orientation.
A primary mechanism enabling chemical navigation is what sensory biologists term bilateral olfaction, or stereo smelling. Because the two human nostrils are separated by a rigid nasal septum and draw air from distinct points in space, they sample slightly different concentrations of airborne volatile compounds. Furthermore, differences in airflow rates between the nostrils create asymmetric mucosal absorption rates, allowing each nostril to be maximally sensitive to different chemical compounds at any given instant. When moving through a scent gradient, the brain computes minute discrepancies between the inputs from each nasal passage. Laboratory assessments have confirmed that when one nostril is artificially obstructed, a person’s ability to pinpoint the origin of a scent plume drops markedly, demonstrating that dual-nostril sampling is essential for directional orientation.
To determine whether this directional capacity functions in naturalistic settings, researchers devised field trials in which blindfolded participants were tasked with tracking scents across open terrain. Deprived of auditory and visual input, subjects were asked to follow a faint trail of essential oils laid down through grass. The results surprised many observers: not only could the majority of participants follow the winding route successfully, but their speed and accuracy improved significantly across successive trials. As participants zigzagged across the trail, their sniffing rates accelerated, mimicking the search behaviour commonly observed in tracking hounds. The findings indicated that humans possess the latent capacity to utilise continuous chemical gradients for ground-based pathfinding, a skill that merely requires practical engagement to surface.
Beyond following explicit ground trails, humans appear to construct complex mental representations of their surroundings based on ambient odours, a phenomenon often described as the cognitive smellscape. Environmental odours are rarely isolated bursts; rather, they form persistent geographic profiles composed of vegetation, soil composition, water bodies, and human activities. In coastal areas, for instance, airborne marine aerosols can travel several kilometres inland, creating a continuous chemical baseline against which local scents are contrasted. One comparative study revealed that individuals who routinely navigate complex urban or forest environments without technological aids frequently incorporate olfactory landmarks—such as bakeries, pine groves, or damp riverbanks—into their internal spatial maps, using shifts in background scent to confirm their general position.
The neural circuitry supporting olfactory navigation provides crucial insight into why smell is so intimately intertwined with spatial awareness. Unlike signals from visual, auditory, or tactile receptors, which are first routed through the thalamus for sensory filtering before reaching higher cortical regions, olfactory information travels along direct pathways to the primary olfactory cortex. From there, it immediately projects to the hippocampus and entorhinal cortex, the twin structures responsible for spatial mapping and memory consolidation. This direct neurological access explains why smells can trigger immediate spatial recognition and vivid recall of specific locations. Specialised grid cells in the entorhinal cortex, which fire at regular intervals to establish an internal coordinate system, appear to adjust their firing patterns in response to sudden changes in ambient odour.
From an evolutionary standpoint, olfactory spatial mapping likely provided ancestral hunter-gatherers with vital survival advantages. While sight is constrained by darkness, dense foliage, and topographic barriers, airborne chemical plumes can drift around obstacles and remain detectable over substantial distances. Early hominins traversing seasonal habitats would have depended on windborne scents to locate ephemeral food sources, such as fruiting trees or animal carcasses, as well as to detect concealed predators or freshwater springs. In environments where visual landmarks were scarce or shifting, such as arid scrublands or dense equatorial rainforests, relying on the prevailing wind and its chemical cargo provided a reliable secondary navigation system that supplemented celestial and topographical cues.
Despite this rich evolutionary heritage, modern lifestyle shifts pose a quiet threat to human olfactory competence. The transition to climate-controlled indoor environments, combined with pervasive synthetic fragrancing and urban atmospheric pollution, has drastically reduced exposure to rich, natural odour landscapes. Researchers refer to this trend as sensory disuse, noting that reduced engagement with diverse olfactory stimuli can lead to a measurable decline in scent discrimination and spatial correlation. Fortunately, this decline does not appear irreversible. Recent clinical trials demonstrate that structured olfactory training—deliberately smelling diverse essential oils daily—stimulates neurogenesis and enhances both olfactory sensitivity and spatial memory performance, underscoring the remarkable plasticity of the human chemical senses.
Questions 1–8
Choose the correct letter, A, B, C or D.
1Why did nineteenth-century anatomists underestimate human smelling abilities?
- AThey believed colour vision had completely replaced the need for sensory receptors.
- BThey observed that the human brain's smell centre was relatively small.
- CThey conducted flawed experiments on how humans move through their surroundings.
- DThey thought humans were incapable of distinguishing between complex chemical molecules.
2According to the text, how does bilateral olfaction assist in identifying the direction of a smell?
- AIt equalises the rate of airflow entering both nasal passages.
- BIt prevents volatile compounds from being absorbed too quickly into the nasal mucosa.
- CIt allows the brain to evaluate slight variations in the input from each nostril.
- DIt enables the brain to ignore background scents and focus on a single odour.
3What did the field trials involving blindfolded participants demonstrate?
- AHumans can navigate along a scent trail and get better with practice.
- BTracking scents across natural terrain requires prior training in hunting techniques.
- CAuditory clues are essential for maintaining a straight path while tracking odours.
- DHuman sniffing rates remain constant regardless of the difficulty of the terrain.
4What does the text suggest about the concept of a "cognitive smellscape"?
- AIt relies mainly on urban fragrances rather than natural vegetation.
- BIt is primarily useful when artificial navigation devices malfunction.
- CIt consists of temporary scents that disappear quickly in open air.
- DIt involves integrating environmental odour patterns into mental geographic maps.
5How does the neural processing of smell differ from that of other senses?
- AIt bypasses the thalamus and links directly to brain areas involved in memory and space.
- BIt is filtered through several sensory hubs before reaching the cerebral cortex.
- CIt prevents grid cells in the entorhinal cortex from changing their electrical signals.
- DIt requires longer processing times because it passes through the primary olfactory cortex.
6Why was olfactory navigation advantageous for early humans compared to visual navigation?
- AAirborne scents provided reliable information during rapid climate changes.
- BOdours could travel around physical obstacles and be detected over long distances.
- CVisual cues could not be used to identify ripening vegetation or water sources.
- DScents allowed ancestral groups to move exclusively during night-time hours.
7What has contributed to the decline of olfactory sensitivity in modern humans?
- AA genetic reduction in the total number of olfactory receptor types.
- BFrequent exposure to changing outdoor weather patterns.
- COveruse of essential oils in everyday clinical therapies.
- DSpending time in regulated indoor spaces with limited natural scents.
8What is the main conclusion of the passage regarding human olfactory navigation?
- AIt is a lost evolutionary trait that cannot be restored in modern populations.
- BIt is superior to visual navigation when exploring unfamiliar urban environments.
- CIt is a capable and adaptable sensory system that can be revitalised through practice.
- DIt functions independently of the brain mechanisms that control memory.
Ready to answer these 8 questions?
Log in to attempt this drill in the BandLadder test player, with instant scoring when you finish.
Ready for a full Reading test?
Three passages, 40 questions of every type and 60 minutes on the clock, with your band score the moment you finish. Your free account also gets AI-scored Writing and Speaking.
Take a full timed test free →Keep practising
More Multiple Choice drills
- How Infants Discover Words in Fluent Speech
- How Physical Spaces Shape Everyday Habits
- How Place Names Record Vanished Landscapes
- How Placebos Alter Bodily Healing
- How Proximity to Goals Influences Effort
- How Recreational Reading Shapes Empathy
- How to answer Multiple Choice questions
- All IELTS Reading practice
Get your band, not just a score
- ✓Full timed Reading and Listening tests
- ✓AI-scored Writing with band feedback
- ✓AI-scored Speaking with an AI examiner
Free account · no card
© 2026 BandLadder. Written and checked by the BandLadder team. You may quote or cite this page with credit to BandLadder and a link to it; republishing it in full needs our written permission. Content use policy