Reading passage
Redefining the Metric Standards
Skip to the questions ↓When the metric system was first conceived in late eighteenth-century France, its architects aimed to create a measurement framework derived from the natural world rather than arbitrary monarchical decrees. The original definition of the metre, set as one ten-millionth of the distance from the North Pole to the Equator along the Paris meridian, reflected this philosophical desire for universal permanence. However, measuring the curvature of the Earth proved enormously difficult and impractical for everyday trade and manufacturing. Consequently, metrologists soon manufactured tangible reference artefacts: metallic bars and cylinders fashioned from durable platinum alloys to serve as primary standards. For more than a century, these physical objects represented the ultimate arbiters of length and weight, against which national standards across the globe were periodically compared and calibrated.
Despite being crafted from the most stable materials available, physical prototypes possessed an unavoidable flaw: they were subject to environmental alterations. The standard metre and the International Prototype of the Kilogram, an alloy cylinder of platinum and iridium manufactured in the late nineteenth century, were safeguarded within subterranean vaults under tightly controlled conditions. They rested beneath multiple concentric glass bell jars to shield them from airborne contaminants. Nevertheless, minute shifts occurred over time. When the master kilogram was extracted for comparison against identical sister copies manufactured alongside it, subtle discrepancies emerged. Cleaning techniques and microscopic surface wear during handling meant that the copies and the original were slowly diverging in mass, demonstrating the inherent fragility of relying on manufactured matter.
The vulnerability of physical artefacts spurred a long-term campaign to replace manufactured prototypes with natural phenomena. Length was the first major dimension to be liberated from metal bars. In the mid-twentieth century, researchers adopted an optical approach, defining the metre by the wavelength of light emitted by krypton-86 atoms. This quantum standard was eventually refined in the early 1980s, when scientists decided to fix the speed of light in a vacuum at an exact numerical value. Under this modern convention, a metre is defined by the distance light travels during a tiny fraction of a second. Because time could be tracked with extreme accuracy using atomic clocks, length was permanently decoupled from physical objects and anchored to an unalterable cosmic constant.
While length, time, and electric current gradually moved toward atomic and optical benchmarks, mass remained stubbornly tied to an artefact. Into the twenty-first century, the international measurement system still rested on the single platinum-iridium cylinder housed near Paris, known colloquially as "Le Grand K". This created an awkward contradiction for modern physics. Sophisticated scientific instruments measuring nanoscale forces or subatomic interactions still relied on a definition traceable to a physical block of metal cast in 1879. If the prototype lost or gained a few stray atoms due to atmospheric absorption or cleaning, the official definition of mass across the entire planet theoretically altered as well. Scientists increasingly viewed this reliance on an earthly object as an unacceptable bottleneck for technological and scientific advancement.
Resolving the mass problem required linking the kilogram to a fundamental constant of quantum mechanics, specifically the Planck constant. Two distinct experimental methodologies were pursued by international teams over several decades. One approach utilised a sophisticated electro-mechanical apparatus known as a Kibble balance, which weighed a test mass by balancing gravitational pull against an exquisitely measured magnetic force. The alternative method, known as the Avogadro project, determined mass by manufacturing ultra-pure spheres of silicon-28 and counting their constituent atoms using X-ray interferometry and laser optical systems. To ensure absolute reliability, both independent methods had to achieve extraordinary precision and produce consistent results within an astonishingly narrow margin of uncertainty before any redefinition could be formally considered.
After decades of experimental refinement, the necessary degree of consensus was finally reached. In late 2018, representatives from dozens of nations assembled at the General Conference on Weights and Measures and voted unanimously to implement the most comprehensive revision of the metric system since its inception. Effective from May 2019, the kilogram, along with the ampere, kelvin, and mole, ceased to be defined by tangible objects or specific experimental conditions. Instead, their values were formally tethered to fixed numerical values of seven universal physical constants. With this historic decision, the last remaining physical standard was retired from its foundational role, completing a centuries-long philosophical shift from tangible human creations to immutable principles of nature.
For the vast majority of human activities, this profound metrological reform passed entirely unnoticed. A standard kilogram of flour in a supermarket or a tonne of steel in a warehouse did not alter in any perceptible manner. However, for precision manufacturing, pharmaceutical engineering, and fundamental physics, the implications were transformative. Laboratories no longer required direct or indirect traceability chains stretching back to a French vault. Any facility with sufficiently advanced technology could realise the kilogram from fundamental principles on site. Furthermore, the revised framework guaranteed that these measurement standards would remain permanently invariant, capable of being used across future centuries and throughout the universe without the risk of physical degradation.
Questions 1–8
Do the following statements agree with the information given in the passage? Write TRUE if the statement agrees with the information FALSE if the statement contradicts the information NOT GIVEN if there is no information on this
1The earliest version of the metre was based on geographical measurements rather than physical objects.
2Regular cleaning prevented the master kilogram and its replicas from developing differences in mass.
3Krypton-86 proved more difficult to measure accurately than scientists had anticipated.
4Improvements in measuring time were essential to establishing a modern definition of the metre.
5Mass was the first base unit to be updated using quantum properties.
6The silicon spheres made for the Avogadro project were less expensive to produce than Kibble balances.
7The 2018 decision to redefine the metric system was opposed by a minority of participating countries.
8Modern laboratories can calibrate mass measurements independently without reference to a physical prototype.
Ready to answer these 8 questions?
Log in to attempt this drill in the BandLadder test player, with instant scoring when you finish.
Ready for a full Reading test?
Three passages, 40 questions of every type and 60 minutes on the clock, with your band score the moment you finish. Your free account also gets AI-scored Writing and Speaking.
Take a full timed test free →Keep practising
More True/False/Not Given drills
Get your band, not just a score
- ✓Full timed Reading and Listening tests
- ✓AI-scored Writing with band feedback
- ✓AI-scored Speaking with an AI examiner
Free account · no card
© 2026 BandLadder. Written and checked by the BandLadder team. You may quote or cite this page with credit to BandLadder and a link to it; republishing it in full needs our written permission. Content use policy