IELTS Reading · True/False/Not Given

The Evolutionary Origins of Animal Toxins

Read the passage and the 8 True/False/Not Given questions below. To attempt the drill, log in free: it opens in the BandLadder test player with instant scoring.
  • 8 questions
  • 833 words
  • About 10 minutes
  • Free account

Reading passage

The Evolutionary Origins of Animal Toxins

Skip to the questions ↓

Across the animal kingdom, venom systems represent one of the most striking examples of convergent evolution. Unlike poisons, which are passively ingested, inhaled, or absorbed through the skin, venoms are sophisticated chemical weapons actively delivered into the tissues of another organism via a wound. While early naturalists often viewed venomous creatures as evolutionary oddities, modern comparative biology indicates that venom has arisen independently on more than one hundred separate occasions. This remarkable convergence spans remarkably diverse lineages, ranging from microscopic cnidarians like box jellyfish and sea anemones to predatory cone snails, arachnids, centipedes, advanced reptiles, and even a handful of mammals such as the platypus and certain shrews. In each instance, natural selection has transformed benign biological compounds into complex biochemical cocktails tailored to incapacitate target organisms.

The primary molecular mechanism driving venom evolution appears to be gene duplication followed by recruitment, or co-option. In this process, a gene that originally codes for an ordinary regulatory or metabolic protein undergoes an accidental duplication during replication. While one copy continues to perform its vital ancestral role, the redundant copy is freed from selective constraints, accumulating mutations over generations. Eventually, these mutated genes begin expressing proteins within specialised secretory tissues connected to a delivery apparatus. Evolutionary biologists have tracked how harmless ancestral proteins—such as digestive enzymes, defensins, and blood-clotting regulators—gradually morphed into lethal neurotoxins, cytotoxins, and haemotoxins. Because the initial proteins already performed interactive tasks with physiological receptors, relatively modest structural modifications were sufficient to turn them into disruptive toxins that overwhelm the prey's cardiovascular or nervous system.

The emergence of toxic cocktails is only one half of the evolutionary equation; it must coincide with the development of physical injection apparatuses. Without an efficient delivery system, even the most potent toxin cannot function as venom. Fossil evidence and comparative anatomy reveal a vast array of mechanical adaptations: modified teeth in snakes and lizards, specialised barbs on the tails of stingrays, articulated hypodermic needles in cone snails, and venom-injecting claws in centipedes. Crucially, developing these systems requires organisms to resolve the problem of self-intoxication. Venomous predators often possess physiological shields, such as modified target receptors that prevent their own toxins from binding, or blood-borne neutralising factors that capture circulating venom molecules before they can cause damage to host tissues.

Despite its formidable advantages in capturing prey and deterring predators, venom is biologically expensive to produce. Synthesising large, complex proteins and maintaining the cellular machinery within specialised glands demands considerable metabolic energy. Consequently, many venomous species exhibit sophisticated behavioural strategies to manage their toxic reserves. Field studies show that predators often calibrate the quantity of venom deployed based on the size, mobility, or danger of their quarry. In some defensive encounters, snakes and scorpions may even deliver dry strikes—bites or stings that inject little or no venom at all—in order to conserve their chemical weaponry for subsequent hunting events. Complete depletion of a venom reserve can leave an animal vulnerable and impair its feeding ability for days or weeks while fresh toxins are slowly regenerated.

The dynamics of venom evolution are further accelerated by predatory arms races. When a venomous predator relies heavily on a specific prey type, natural selection strongly favours prey individuals that carry mutations conferring resistance to the predator's toxins. For instance, several species of small mammals, such as woodrats and opossums, have evolved serum proteins that neutralise the haemorrhagic compounds of pit vipers. In response to this physiological resistance, the predator lineage experiences intense evolutionary pressure to modify its venom composition, either by altering existing toxins or recruiting entirely new gene families into the cocktail. This reciprocal evolutionary pressure often leads to hypervariable venom genes, which mutate at rates significantly faster than standard housekeeping genes within the same organism.

Because venom carries a substantial metabolic burden, it can also be rapidly lost or reduced when ecological conditions shift. If a venomous species transitions to a food source that no longer requires chemical immobilisation, the selective pressure to maintain functional venom glands and complex toxins diminishes. A notable example is found among certain marine sea snakes that switched from capturing evasive, agile fish to feeding exclusively on stationary fish eggs. Over evolutionary timescales, these egg-eating snakes experienced widespread gene degradation in their venom-producing pathways. Their fangs became noticeably reduced in size, and their venom glands atrophied, demonstrating that without active evolutionary maintenance, complex venom apparatuses quickly deteriorate through the accumulation of neutral or deleterious mutations.

The intricate biochemistry honed by millions of years of natural selection has also made animal venoms a valuable frontier for biomedical research. Because venoms are naturally engineered to target specific ion channels and physiological receptors with exceptional precision, individual toxin components can serve as structural blueprints for therapeutic drugs. Researchers have successfully derived pain relievers, antihypertensive medications, and anticoagulants from the venoms of snakes, cone snails, and lizards. As genomic and proteomic sequencing technologies continue to improve, scientists are uncovering an ever-expanding catalogue of novel peptides, demonstrating that these ancient weapons of predation hold immense promise for human medicine.

Questions 1–8

Do the following statements agree with the information given in the passage? Write TRUE if the statement agrees with the information FALSE if the statement contradicts the information NOT GIVEN if there is no information on this

  1. 1Venomous mechanisms have evolved independently across more than a hundred distinct evolutionary lineages.

  2. 2Gene duplication prevents normal physiological proteins from continuing their original cellular functions.

  3. 3Major structural alterations were required to transform ancestral regulatory proteins into functional toxins.

  4. 4Some venomous species are more vulnerable to self-intoxication than others.

  5. 5Animals may deliver bites containing no venom when attempting to defend themselves.

  6. 6Opossums developed resistance to snake venom before woodrats evolved similar capabilities.

  7. 7Genes responsible for venom production tend to mutate more rapidly than typical housekeeping genes.

  8. 8Sea snakes that adapted to eating fish eggs retained the full physical dimensions of their fangs.

Ready to answer these 8 questions?

Log in to attempt this drill in the BandLadder test player, with instant scoring when you finish.

Ready for a full Reading test?

Three passages, 40 questions of every type and 60 minutes on the clock, with your band score the moment you finish. Your free account also gets AI-scored Writing and Speaking.

Take a full timed test free →

Keep practising

More True/False/Not Given drills

Get your band, not just a score

  • ✓Full timed Reading and Listening tests
  • ✓AI-scored Writing with band feedback
  • ✓AI-scored Speaking with an AI examiner
Take a full timed test free

Free account · no card

© 2026 BandLadder. Written and checked by the BandLadder team. You may quote or cite this page with credit to BandLadder and a link to it; republishing it in full needs our written permission. Content use policy

Log in to attempt — free