IELTS Speaking Part 3

Trust and commitments in modern society: Part 3 questions and answers

Part 3 is a four-to-five-minute discussion that takes the Part 2 topic into wider ideas. Here are 5 questions on trust and commitments in modern society, each with a Band 8 model answer, plus how to handle this theme and the words that lift it.
  • 5 questions
  • Band 8 model answers
  • 4 to 5 minutes

These questions follow the cue card Describe a very reliable person you know. Do that card first for the full Part 2 to Part 3 flow.

5 questions

Questions and Band 8 answers

1

Why do some people find it difficult to honour their promises?

In many cases, people overcommit simply because they want to please others and struggle with saying no. When unexpected schedule clashes or personal emergencies arise, those promises inevitably fall by the wayside. For example, a colleague might agree to help on three different projects simultaneously, only to miss every deadline due to sheer exhaustion. That said, some individuals are simply disorganised rather than intentionally deceitful, but the disappointing outcome remains identical.

2

How has the way people make commitments changed compared to the past?

Historically, agreements were far more rigid, often sealed with a handshake and carried substantial social weight within close-knit communities. Nowadays, the flexibility afforded by mobile phones and instant messaging has made social commitments somewhat more casual and fluid. It is commonplace to send a text message cancelling dinner plans at the last minute. Nevertheless, in legal and formal spheres, written contracts have actually become far more rigorous to counteract this growing casualness.

3

To what extent is keeping promises important in professional business environments?

Reliability is paramount in commerce because commercial partnerships hinge entirely on mutual credibility and contractual obligations. If a supplier regularly fails to deliver raw materials on the agreed date, the entire supply chain breaks down, causing severe financial repercussions. For instance, a construction firm missing milestones risks hefty penalty clauses. Of course, unforeseen supply disruptions do occur, but transparent communication is vital to maintain corporate goodwill when deadlines cannot be met.

4

What are the drawbacks of always trying to keep every single commitment?

While being dependable is unquestionably an admirable trait, striving to honour every single pledge can result in extreme burnout. Individuals who never back out of commitments often sacrifice their mental health and neglect their own personal needs to avoid disappointing peers. A student balancing a heavy workload might still volunteer for extra duties, leading to chronic stress. Consequently, learning when to gracefully decline or renegotiate terms is just as important as dependability.

5

Do you think society in the future will place greater or lesser value on personal trust?

I suspect personal trust will become even more prized in the future, precisely because automated systems and superficial online interactions are eroding authentic connections. As digital identity fraud and anonymous communication proliferate, individuals will place a premium on partners and associates with proven track records of integrity. However, institutional mechanisms such as digital verification systems might reduce our reliance on interpersonal trust for everyday transactions, shifting our focus toward formal validation.

Use the shape, not the sentences: a view, a reason, an example, a limit. Examiners mark memorised answers down.

Say your answers and get a band

The AI examiner asks Part 3 questions after your cue card, listens, and scores fluency, vocabulary, grammar and pronunciation, with the words that cost you.

Log in to practise this with AI scoring — free →

Strategy

How to discuss trust and commitments in modern society

  1. 1

    Balance broad social trends with specific, grounded examples from everyday or working life.

  2. 2

    Conclude each response by acknowledging an exception or qualification to demonstrate critical thinking.

  3. 3

    Use cohesive transition phrases such as 'Consequently' and 'That said' to link complex points smoothly.

6 words

Vocabulary for this discussion

  • overcommit

    to promise more time or effort than is actually realistic

  • close-knit

    closely bonded and supportive as a community

  • hinge entirely on

    to depend completely on something specific

  • burnout

    physical or emotional exhaustion caused by prolonged stress

  • place a premium on

    to hold something in exceptionally high regard

  • integrity

    the quality of being honest and morally sound

Frequently asked questions

How long should a Part 3 answer be?+

Usually four to six sentences, or 30 to 60 seconds. Give a clear view, a reason, an example and, where it fits, a limit or an exception. The examiner will interrupt if you go on too long, which is normal.

Does Part 3 follow the cue card?+

Yes. Part 3 takes the theme of your Part 2 card and makes it abstract: society, comparisons, causes and the future. These questions follow the card "Describe a very reliable person you know".

Can I say I don't know?+

You can say you haven't thought about it much, but then give your best guess with a reason. Examiners score your language, not your knowledge.

Keep practising

More Part 3 discussions: a person

© 2026 BandLadder. Written and checked by the BandLadder team. You may quote or cite this page with credit to BandLadder and a link to it; republishing it in full needs our written permission. Content use policy

Log in to practise free