Should university education be free for all students?
The question
Some people think that university education should be free for all students, while others believe that students should pay for their own education. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
About 40 minutes. Write at least 250 words.
Plan before you write
- Position:
- I believe that state-funded higher education is a vital investment for societal development despite the substantial financial burden on taxpayers.
- Paragraph 2:
- Proponents of free tuition argue that it ensures equality of opportunity by removing financial barriers to academic achievement.
- Paragraph 3:
- Conversely, those who oppose free tuition contend that personal investment fosters academic diligence and protects the economy from excessive public spending.
- Give each view its own paragraph, explained fairly even where you disagree.
- Say where you stand in the introduction and again in the conclusion; the question asks for your opinion.
- Do not merge the two views into one paragraph; examiners look for both to be developed.
Band 8 sample essay
The question of whether higher education should be provided at no cost or funded by students is a contentious issue. While some argue that tuition fees are a necessary personal investment, others maintain that free access is essential for a fair society. I believe that state-funded university education is a vital investment for national development, despite the substantial financial burden it places on taxpayers.
Those who advocate for free university education argue that it fosters equality by removing financial barriers to academic achievement. When tuition is free, students from low-income backgrounds are empowered to pursue degrees based solely on their ability rather than their family's wealth. This inclusivity ensures that society benefits from the full potential of all its citizens. For instance, countries like Germany have seen a surge in skilled professionals because their tuition-free policies allow talented individuals to enter high-demand fields like engineering and medicine without the burden of crippling debt.
Conversely, many contend that students should pay for their own education to encourage personal responsibility. When individuals invest their own capital, they are arguably more motivated to treat their studies with gravity, leading to higher completion rates. Furthermore, critics of universal subsidies argue that public funds are better allocated to primary education or healthcare. For example, in the United States, high tuition costs are often defended by the argument that they sustain high-quality facilities and research infrastructure, which might deteriorate if universities were forced to rely exclusively on government grants.
In my view, the long-term economic gains of a highly educated population outweigh the immediate fiscal costs of providing free degrees. Although personal financial accountability has its merits, removing the hurdle of tuition fees is a more effective strategy for cultivating a competitive and equitable nation. By prioritising universal access to knowledge, governments can ensure that talent is nurtured rather than stifled by economic circumstances.
308 words. Use the structure and the vocabulary, not the sentences.
Why this scores Band 8
The essay achieves Band 8 by maintaining a consistent, sophisticated argument throughout and addressing both sides with balanced, logically linked examples. A Band 6 response often fails to provide a clear personal opinion or relies on repetitive, simplistic arguments without specific illustrative evidence.
Vocabulary from the essay
- contentious
- causing or likely to cause an intense argument
- inclusivity
- the practice of providing equal access to opportunities
- crippling debt
- a very large and damaging amount of debt
- fiscal
- relating to government revenue and public money
- stifled
- prevented from developing or growing as expected
- subsidies
- money granted by the state to support industry
- cultivating
- trying to acquire or develop a particular quality
- gravity
- extreme importance or seriousness of a situation
Write this one yourself and get a band
Forty minutes, then a band for task response, coherence, vocabulary and grammar, with the sentences that cost you marked.
Practise IELTS writingOn your phone? Get the BandLadder app for scored writing practice anywhere.
Frequently asked questions
What type of essay is "Should university education be free for all students?"?
Discussion (both views and your opinion). Give each view its own paragraph, explained fairly even where you disagree.
How long should the answer be?
At least 250 words. This sample is 308 words, written to fit 40 minutes with five minutes left to check grammar.
What is the difference between a Band 6 and a Band 8 answer here?
The essay achieves Band 8 by maintaining a consistent, sophisticated argument throughout and addressing both sides with balanced, logically linked examples. A Band 6 response often fails to provide a clear personal opinion or relies on repetitive, simplistic arguments without specific illustrative evidence.
More sample essays
- Artificial Intelligence and Education: Agree or Disagree Analysis
- Compulsory community service in schools: discuss both views
- Free university education for all: discuss both views
- Learning foreign languages at school: discuss both views
- Learning foreign languages in primary school: discuss both views
- Artificial Intelligence and Job Displacement: Discuss Both Views
- Celebrity salaries versus essential workers: discuss both views
- Choosing a career: salary versus job satisfaction discussion
- All 148 sample essays