The Co-Accretion Dilemma
The co-accretion or sister-world hypothesis suggests that the Earth and the Moon grew concurrently as a binary system from a shared feeding zone within the solar nebula. In this scenario, planetesimals and dust grains within the ancestral accretion disc were drawn simultaneously towards two distinct gravitational centres, yielding a secondary circumterrestrial debris disc from which the Moon coalesced.
While co-accretion intuitively accounts for the similarities in orbital plane alignment and gross positional stability, it struggles severely to explain the stark compositional divergence between the two bodies. The bulk density of the Moon is notably lower than that of the Earth, reflecting a severe deficiency in metallic iron. Earth possesses a massive metallic core constituting roughly one-third of its total mass, whereas the lunar core represents less than two to three percent of its mass.
If both bodies accumulated unselectively from the same local reservoir of nebular solids, they should have acquired comparable proportions of metallic and silicate fractions. To salvage the co-accretion framework, theorists have suggested complex aerodynamic sorting mechanisms, wherein fragile silicate aggregates were preferentially captured by the proto-lunar swarm while denser iron-rich planetesimals plunged into the growing Earth. However, hydrodynamical simulations demonstrate that gas drag alone is insufficient to produce the pronounced level of compositional differentiation observed between the two bodies.
Which of the following statements about the co-accretion model are supported by the passage?
- AThe Moon's bulk density is significantly lower than that of the Earth due to its smaller metallic core.
- BIt suggests both bodies developed simultaneously from a shared pool of nebular material.
- CHydrodynamic simulations confirm that aerodynamic sorting fully explains lunar iron depletion.
- DIt easily accounts for the severe disparity in iron content between the Earth and the Moon.
- EIt explains the alignment of the Moon's orbital plane more naturally than compositional differences.