Reading passage
Harnessing the Power of the Oceans
Skip to the questions ↓The world’s oceans represent an immense and largely untapped reservoir of kinetic and thermal energy. While early marine power initiatives focused primarily on tidal barrages—large civil engineering structures built across estuaries that relied on the rise and fall of the tide—contemporary research has shifted toward modular, offshore technologies. These modern converters aim to harness the movement of water currents, the oscillation of surface waves, and deep-sea temperature differentials with minimal disruption to natural shorelines. Proponents argue that marine renewables offer distinct advantages over terrestrial wind and solar power, most notably higher energy density and, in certain configurations, far superior predictability. Nevertheless, deploying machinery in corrosive, high-energy marine environments presents severe engineering hurdles that have historically slowed commercial deployment.
Among dynamic water systems, tidal stream generators have advanced most rapidly toward commercial viability. Operating on principles analogous to submerged wind turbines, these devices extract kinetic energy from fast-flowing horizontal currents created by gravitational interactions between the Earth, Moon, and Sun. Because the density of seawater is approximately eight hundred times that of air, tidal rotors can capture substantial power at relatively modest flow velocities. A key operational strength is astronomical predictability; unlike atmospheric weather patterns, tidal movements can be calculated decades in advance, allowing grid operators to anticipate supply fluctuations with remarkable precision. However, these installations face aggressive mechanical stress. Strong turbulence induces cyclic loading on the rotor blades, while the abrasive movement of seabed sediment, known as scouring, can erode anchoring foundations and underwater cabling over extended periods.
In contrast to tidal systems, wave energy converters (WECs) capture energy generated by wind blowing across open oceanic fetches. Device architectures vary widely, ranging from floating point absorbers that bob on the surface to oscillating water columns that use trapped air pockets to drive an above-water turbine. Because wave motion encompasses both heave and surge, extracting this power requires complex hydraulic or direct-drive power take-off mechanisms. While the global wave resource is vast, its primary drawback lies in extreme variability. Wave regimes change rapidly according to storm cycles, meaning devices must operate efficiently in gentle swells yet survive devastating mechanical loads during severe tempests. To withstand extreme sea states, modern designs frequently incorporate automated ballasting systems or submergence capabilities that temporarily sink the buoyant components beneath the most turbulent surface layers.
A fundamentally different thermodynamic approach is Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion (OTEC), which exploits the temperature disparity between sun-warmed tropical surface waters and ice-cold water pumped from depths exceeding one thousand metres. In a closed-cycle OTEC facility, warm surface water evaporates a working fluid with a low boiling point, such as ammonia, expanding the resulting vapour through an electricity-generating turbine before deep seawater condenses it back into liquid form. Unlike intermittent wave and tidal mechanisms, OTEC functions as a dependable provider of baseload power, operating continuously regardless of weather or diurnal cycles. The chief impediment to OTEC is its low thermodynamic efficiency, which rarely exceeds four percent. Consequently, facilities require massive volumes of water, necessitating enormous intake pipes that are susceptible to structural fatigue and deep-sea pressure differentials.
The environmental ramifications of these three approaches also diverge considerably. Tidal turbines generate underwater acoustic emissions that can alter the navigational behaviour of marine mammals, though monitored trials suggest fish largely avoid rotating blades. Wave installations occupy broad surface footprints, raising concerns regarding navigational safety for commercial vessels and visual disruption along pristine coastlines. For OTEC, the primary ecological consideration involves the artificial upwelling of nutrient-dense deep water. If discharged directly near the surface without careful mitigation, these cold, nutrient-rich effluents can trigger harmful algal blooms and modify local marine ecosystems by altering dissolved oxygen concentrations and natural thermal stratification.
Material resilience remains a shared bottleneck across all marine energy domains. Subsea components face rapid degradation from electrochemical corrosion and biofouling—the accumulation of barnacles, algae, and molluscs on exposed surfaces. Biofouling increases hydrodynamic drag on floating hulls and accelerates the wear of dynamic power cables transmitting electricity to mainland substations. Researchers are currently evaluating non-toxic silicone-based coatings and advanced composites to extend maintenance intervals. Because offshore servicing vessels incur exorbitant operational costs, lengthening the operational lifespan of submerged components without human intervention is essential to lowering the levelised cost of ocean-derived electricity.
Despite ongoing technical hurdles, the strategic value of marine power is gaining recognition, particularly for remote island territories and isolated coastal grids where importing fossil fuels incurs crippling expenses. In such locations, OTEC can simultaneously yield desalinated freshwater as a byproduct of open-cycle evaporation, while tidal and wave devices provide high-yield local electricity. As research consortia refine hybrid offshore platforms that combine floating wind turbines with wave absorption systems, marine energy appears poised to transition from experimental prototypes into a vital component of the global renewable portfolio, filling regional generation gaps that conventional renewables cannot resolve.
Questions 1–7
Complete the table below. Choose ONE WORD ONLY from the passage for each answer.
Word limit: ONE WORD ONLY
Comparison of Marine Renewable Energy Technologies
| Technology | Primary Energy Driver | Key Advantage | Operational or Environmental Issue |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tidal stream turbines | Kinetic force extracted from horizontal 1 | High level of astronomical 2 aids power forecasting | Damage to base fixtures and lines from seabed 3 |
| Wave energy converters (WECs) | Swell energy produced by oceanic wind | Survives rough weather via temporary 4 of floating parts | Vessel hazards and coastal visual 5 |
| Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion (OTEC) | Evaporation of chemicals such as 6 using thermal differences | Constant production of 7 electricity | Low efficiency and risks from nutrient-rich upwelling |
Ready to answer these 7 questions?
Log in to attempt this drill in the BandLadder test player, with instant scoring when you finish.
Ready for a full Reading test?
Three passages, 40 questions of every type and 60 minutes on the clock, with your band score the moment you finish. Your free account also gets AI-scored Writing and Speaking.
Take a full timed test free →Keep practising
More Table Completion drills
- Harnessing the Wind: Passive Aerodynamic Towers
- Household Composting in Zero-Waste Systems
- Indoor Bioaerosols and Respiratory Health
- Industrial High-Temperature Heat Pumps
- Industrial Water Electrolysis for Hydrogen Production
- Innovations in Solar Cell Materials
- How to answer Table Completion questions
- All IELTS Reading practice
Get your band, not just a score
- ✓Full timed Reading and Listening tests
- ✓AI-scored Writing with band feedback
- ✓AI-scored Speaking with an AI examiner
Free account · no card
© 2026 BandLadder. Written and checked by the BandLadder team. You may quote or cite this page with credit to BandLadder and a link to it; republishing it in full needs our written permission. Content use policy