IELTS Reading · Table Completion

Industrial Water Electrolysis for Hydrogen Production

Read the passage and the 8 Table Completion questions below. To attempt the drill, log in free: it opens in the BandLadder test player with instant scoring.
  • 8 questions
  • 818 words
  • About 10 minutes
  • Free account

Reading passage

Industrial Water Electrolysis for Hydrogen Production

Skip to the questions ↓

As global efforts to decarbonise heavy industry and transport intensify, hydrogen has emerged as a cornerstone of future energy systems. Historically, the vast majority of commercial hydrogen has been generated via steam methane reforming, a fossil-fuel process that yields substantial carbon emissions. In contrast, water electrolysis offers a sustainable alternative by utilising electrical energy to dissociate water molecules into hydrogen and oxygen. When powered by renewable sources such as wind or solar, this process yields green hydrogen. The challenge facing widespread adoption, however, is not the fundamental chemistry of electrolysis, but rather the economic and technical efficiency of the devices that carry it out. Today, multiple electrolyser designs exist, each characterised by distinct operating temperatures, material requirements, and dynamic responsiveness to intermittent electrical inputs.

The most technologically mature approach is alkaline electrolysis (AEL), a system that has been deployed in commercial settings for more than a century. AEL systems typically employ a liquid electrolyte solution, commonly potassium hydroxide diluted in purified water, separated by a porous diaphragm. The electrodes are largely fabricated from inexpensive, abundant metals such as nickel and iron, which substantially lowers capital expenditure compared to newer alternatives. Operating at modest temperatures between 60°C and 90°C, alkaline units boast impressive operational longevity and robust durability over decades of service. Nevertheless, they suffer from significant drawbacks, including relatively low current densities and an inherent sluggishness in adapting to variable power inputs. Because fluctuations in electrical current can cause cross-contamination of gases across the porous diaphragm, standard alkaline plants are ill-suited for direct coupling with erratic renewable energy supplies without auxiliary power stabilisation.

To address the operational limitations of alkaline systems, proton exchange membrane (PEM) electrolysers were developed. Instead of a liquid caustic solution, PEM devices employ a solid, highly acidic polymer membrane that acts simultaneously as the electrolyte and the physical barrier preventing product gas crossover. This compact architecture enables operation at far higher current densities and elevated pressures, reducing the need for external mechanical compressors. Most importantly, PEM systems demonstrate remarkable operational flexibility, capable of ramping output up or down within seconds to mirror the unpredictable generation profiles of wind turbines and solar panels. However, the corrosive nature of the acidic membrane dictates the use of scarce and expensive noble metal catalysts, predominantly platinum at the cathode and iridium at the anode. The high cost and supply constraints of these precious metals currently restrict large-scale commercial manufacturing.

Operating at the opposite end of the thermal spectrum, solid oxide electrolysis cells (SOEC) represent an advanced class of high-temperature devices. Rather than liquid water, SOEC systems consume superheated steam, functioning at temperatures typically spanning 600°C to 850°C. The electrolyte consists of a dense, non-porous ceramic material, most commonly yttria-stabilised zirconia, which conducts oxygen ions between ceramic-metallic electrodes. The fundamental advantage of high-temperature operation lies in thermodynamics: heat supplies a substantial proportion of the energy required to break chemical bonds, dramatically reducing the electrical energy input needed per kilogram of hydrogen produced. Consequently, SOEC units achieve electrical efficiencies unmatched by low-temperature counterparts, making them exceptionally appealing for industrial facilities that generate copious waste heat, such as steel mills and chemical refineries.

Despite their thermodynamic superiority, solid oxide systems encounter formidable engineering hurdles. The intense thermal conditions induce severe mechanical stress across the interfaces between ceramic and metal components, accelerating material degradation and shortening operational lifespans. Furthermore, thermal inertia prevents rapid cold starts; bringing an SOEC facility up to operating temperature can take several hours, precluding swift responses to grid fluctuations. While steady-state industrial applications with constant thermal and electrical inputs can harness SOEC technology effectively, its reliance on brittle ceramic structures makes it vulnerable to cracking under cyclic thermal loading, prompting researchers to seek more resilient structural matrices.

An emerging technology attempting to bridge the gap between low capital cost and dynamic flexibility is the anion exchange membrane (AEM) electrolyser. AEM systems combine the benign, alkaline chemical environment of traditional AEL with the thin, solid-state membrane design of PEM devices. By conducting hydroxide ions through a polymer membrane, AEM avoids the corrosive acidity of PEM, thereby eliminating the necessity for costly noble metal catalysts and allowing the use of transition metals like nickel or cobalt. This hybrid configuration theoretically delivers rapid dynamic responsiveness at a fraction of the component cost. However, AEM technology remains largely at the pilot stage, as existing membranes still suffer from limited chemical stability and reduced ionic conductivity over prolonged continuous operation.

Ultimately, the choice of electrolysis technology will depend on the specific economic and geographic context of deployment. Where abundant, continuous waste heat is accessible, high-temperature ceramic systems provide the highest overall efficiency. Conversely, decentralised facilities relying directly on volatile solar or wind farms will likely favour the agility of membrane-based systems. As global manufacturing scales up and material innovations reduce reliance on critical raw materials, a diverse portfolio of electrolysers will be required to replace fossil-based feedstocks and realise a decarbonised industrial economy.

Questions 1–8

Complete the table below. Choose ONE WORD ONLY from the passage for each answer.

Word limit: ONE WORD ONLY

Comparison of Main Electrolyser Technologies

Electrolyser TypeOperating Principle / Core MaterialsKey AdvantagesPrimary Drawbacks / Challenges
Alkaline (AEL)Liquid electrolyte separated by a porous 1Uses inexpensive metals; proven long-term durabilityRisk of gas 2 caused by power fluctuations
Proton Exchange Membrane (PEM)Acidic solid polymer membrane; no liquid caustic solutionExceptional operational 3 allows quick adjustment to renewable energyDependence on expensive metals such as platinum and 4
Solid Oxide (SOEC)Consumes superheated 5 instead of water in liquid formHighest electrical efficiency when utilising industrial waste heatFragile ceramic components are susceptible to 6 when temperatures cycle
Anion Exchange Membrane (AEM)Transports 7 ions across a polymer membraneFast response times without requiring precious noble metalsMembranes currently exhibit insufficient chemical 8 over extended periods

Ready to answer these 8 questions?

Log in to attempt this drill in the BandLadder test player, with instant scoring when you finish.

Ready for a full Reading test?

Three passages, 40 questions of every type and 60 minutes on the clock, with your band score the moment you finish. Your free account also gets AI-scored Writing and Speaking.

Take a full timed test free →

Keep practising

More Table Completion drills

Get your band, not just a score

  • ✓Full timed Reading and Listening tests
  • ✓AI-scored Writing with band feedback
  • ✓AI-scored Speaking with an AI examiner
Take a full timed test free

Free account · no card

© 2026 BandLadder. Written and checked by the BandLadder team. You may quote or cite this page with credit to BandLadder and a link to it; republishing it in full needs our written permission. Content use policy

Log in to attempt — free