IELTS Reading · Table Completion

Selecting Trees for Modern Streets

Read the passage and the 8 Table Completion questions below. To attempt the drill, log in free: it opens in the BandLadder test player with instant scoring.
  • 8 questions
  • 792 words
  • About 10 minutes
  • Free account

Reading passage

Selecting Trees for Modern Streets

Skip to the questions ↓

Urban street trees provide essential services, from moderating extreme temperatures to intercepting stormwater and improving air quality. However, the urban environment presents a hostile habitat for plant life. Street trees must endure severe soil compaction, restricted rooting volumes, elevated levels of atmospheric pollutants, and reflected radiation from asphalt and masonry. In the past, municipal planners often relied on a narrow selection of uniform species, creating aesthetic consistency across boulevards. This reliance on monocultures frequently ended in widespread ecological failure, most notably when Dutch elm disease eradicated millions of mature canopy trees across European and North American cities in the twentieth century. Consequently, modern urban arborists must balance visual appeal against biological resilience, carefully evaluating how specific species cope with the artificial stresses of metropolitan landscapes.

For well over a century, the London plane (Platanus × acerifolia) served as the undisputed favourite for industrial cities. Its enduring popularity stems largely from its capacity to thrive in polluted air; the tree absorbs gaseous toxins while microscopic particulate matter collects on its broad, tough leaves. Furthermore, the species sheds its outer bark in large plates, a process of continuous exfoliation that prevents soot and industrial grime from permanently clogging its respiratory lenticels. Nevertheless, the London plane poses significant maintenance problems for contemporary highway managers. Its vigorous, shallow root system frequently triggers pavement heave, cracking asphalt and dislodging kerbstones. Additionally, during intense summer heatwaves, the species experiences acute moisture stress, shedding substantial quantities of foliage prematurely to conserve water. Fine airborne hairs shed from developing leaves in spring can also trigger respiratory irritation and allergic reactions among sensitive city dwellers.

Another resilient candidate gaining favour in modern urban forestry is the Ginkgo biloba, commonly known as the maidenhair tree. Having survived virtually unchanged since the Jurassic period, the ginkgo demonstrates extraordinary physiological durability. In roadside trials, it displays an exceptional tolerance of extreme soil compaction, maintaining cellular root respiration where other species suffocate. It is similarly unbothered by toxic vehicle emissions and urban fungal pathogens. However, the tree is not without management complications. Mature female trees produce fleshy seed coats containing high concentrations of butyric acid, which emit an overwhelming odour reminiscent of rancid butter when crushed underfoot. To prevent public complaints, municipal nurseries must plant exclusively male clones. Moreover, arborists must accommodate its sluggish initial growth, which leaves young saplings vulnerable to physical vandalism for several seasons after planting.

Where planting locations are severely constrained by subterranean utilities or narrow pavements, larger canopy trees prove impractical. In such tight corridors, arborists frequently turn to the field maple (Acer campestre). Characterised by a compact crown that rarely interferes with overhead cables or street lighting, this native deciduous species excels at creating microclimatic wind buffers along exposed thoroughfares. Its dense foliage effectively dampens turbulent gusts channelled between high-rise buildings. Nonetheless, the field maple possesses a notable physiological weakness: an acute sensitivity to road salt applied during winter highway de-icing. When dissolved sodium chloride infiltrates the root zone via surface run-off, the tree suffers from severe leaf scorch, resulting in extensive marginal necrosis and premature crown thinning. As a result, its deployment is increasingly restricted to residential roads free from heavy grit treatment.

In contrast to the field maple, the honey locust (Gleditsia triacanthos) exhibits remarkable resistance to alkaline soils and heavy concentrations of de-icing salts, making it an ideal candidate for major multi-lane avenues. Rather than casting dense, cooling shade, its delicate, pinnate leaves produce light dappled shade, which prevents the severe surface cooling that can hinder ground-level turf and understorey shrubs while still reducing radiant heat. A further advantage is its modest leaf litter, which decays rapidly in autumn without blocking street drainage gullies. However, structural integrity remains a serious concern for municipal managers. The wood of the honey locust is relatively brittle, rendering mature limbs susceptible to sudden wind damage during seasonal gales. To mitigate this hazard and protect pedestrians and vehicles, arboricultural teams must commit to intensive formative pruning regimes throughout the life of the tree.

The contemporary approach to urban tree planting avoids seeking a single universal species. Instead, modern urban foresters implement the '10-20-30 rule', an ecological guideline stipulating that an urban forest should contain no more than 10 per cent of any single species, 20 per cent of any one genus, and 30 per cent of any single botanical family. Alongside this diversification, advances in planting pit design, such as structural soil matrices and modular root cells, enable root systems to expand beneath pavements without destabilising physical infrastructure. These subterranean systems simultaneously capture excess stormwater run-off, filtering contaminants before moisture replenishes deep groundwater reserves. By pairing species-specific biological strengths with modern engineering techniques, cities can establish durable street canopies capable of withstanding the accelerating pressures of urban warming and climatic volatility.

Questions 1–8

Complete the table below. Choose NO MORE THAN TWO WORDS AND/OR A NUMBER from the passage for each answer.

Word limit: NO MORE THAN TWO WORDS AND/OR A NUMBER

Urban Street Tree Comparison

SpeciesPrimary AdvantagesEnvironmental / Structural DrawbacksManagement Considerations
London plane (Platanus × acerifolia)Traps particulate pollution; bark undergoes 1 to prevent soot accumulationShallow roots frequently lead to 2Suffers moisture stress in heatwaves; airborne hairs cause allergies
Maidenhair tree (Ginkgo biloba)Shows remarkable tolerance of extreme 3; immune to toxic emissions and fungiFleshy fallen seeds release an 4Municipalities plant only male clones; saplings need protection due to slow growth
Field maple (Acer campestre)Has a compact crown; creates helpful 5 along breezy roadsHigh risk of 6 when exposed to de-icing salt run-offBest planted in areas without heavy winter gritting
Honey locust (Gleditsia triacanthos)Tolerates alkaline soils and road salt; provides 7 beneficial to lower plants; leaf litter degrades quicklyBrittle branches are prone to 8 during galesRequires continuous formative pruning throughout its life

Ready to answer these 8 questions?

Log in to attempt this drill in the BandLadder test player, with instant scoring when you finish.

Ready for a full Reading test?

Three passages, 40 questions of every type and 60 minutes on the clock, with your band score the moment you finish. Your free account also gets AI-scored Writing and Speaking.

Take a full timed test free →

Keep practising

More Table Completion drills

Get your band, not just a score

  • ✓Full timed Reading and Listening tests
  • ✓AI-scored Writing with band feedback
  • ✓AI-scored Speaking with an AI examiner
Take a full timed test free

Free account · no card

© 2026 BandLadder. Written and checked by the BandLadder team. You may quote or cite this page with credit to BandLadder and a link to it; republishing it in full needs our written permission. Content use policy

Log in to attempt — free