IELTS Reading · Yes/No/Not Given

Deep-Sea Vents and the Origins of Life

Read the passage and the 8 Yes/No/Not Given questions below. To attempt the drill, log in free: it opens in the BandLadder test player with instant scoring.
  • 8 questions
  • 814 words
  • About 10 minutes
  • Free account

Reading passage

Deep-Sea Vents and the Origins of Life

Skip to the questions ↓

When deep-sea hydrothermal vents were first observed in the eastern Pacific during the late 1970s, they fundamentally upended biology by revealing ecosystems sustained entirely without sunlight. For decades, biologists operated under the assumption that life required sunlight for photosynthesis, rendering the abyssal plain a vast ecological desert. Almost immediately, scientists proposed that such volcanic fissures might have provided the cradle for Earth’s earliest living organisms, challenging the long-dominant paradigm of a sunlit ‘primordial soup’. Yet, in my view, the early and widespread enthusiasm for extremely hot ‘black smoker’ vents as nurseries of life was fundamentally misplaced. While these towering mineral chimneys certainly demonstrate that complex food webs can thrive in the abyss, the specific geochemical conditions found within them are distinctly hostile to the delicate precursors of biochemistry.

Black smokers erupt acidic, metal-rich fluids at temperatures frequently exceeding 400 degrees Celsius into the freezing surrounding ocean. Proponents of black smoker abiogenesis have often pointed to the abundant sulfur and iron minerals as ideal catalysts for prebiotic reactions. However, this argument fails to account for fundamental thermodynamic realities. Intense heat rapidly hydrolyses RNA, denatures amino acids, and shatters fragile lipid membranes far more swiftly than such compounds can assemble. Some researchers attempt to circumvent this problem by hypothesising that synthesis occurred in cooler boundary zones, yet even there, the sheer acidity remains acutely destructive. To suggest that the complex polymers of life emerged within such volatile thermal cauldrons is, I believe, to misunderstand the delicate equilibrium required for organic synthesis. The chaotic mixing of superheated water and icy seawater produces sheer physical and chemical disruption rather than stable metabolic pathways.

A far more compelling alternative emerged with the discovery of alkaline hydrothermal vents, such as the Lost City field in the Mid-Atlantic. Unlike black smokers, alkaline vents operate at much gentler temperatures, rarely exceeding 90 degrees Celsius, and are driven by serpentinisation—a chemical reaction between seawater and mantle rock. Crucially, their porous structures of calcium carbonate and iron-sulfur minerals resemble microscopic labyrinths of inorganic cells. In these tiny cavities, natural proton gradients develop across thin mineral walls, mirroring the precise bioenergetic mechanism that every living cell uses to generate ATP. It seems undeniable that alkaline vents provide the only known geochemical environment that naturally replicates the electrical and structural architecture of modern cellular respiration.

Recently, however, proponents of terrestrial origin models have mounted a fierce counter-attack. They maintain that life must have begun in land-based volcanic hot springs, arguing that cyclical wetting and drying phases on land are indispensable for polymerising nucleotides into functional RNA—a process they claim is thermodynamically impossible in a permanently wet ocean. Yet this terrestrial perspective suffers from a severe geological blind spot. During the Hadean and early Archean eons, Earth possessed little emergent continental crust and was subjected to continuous, cataclysmic asteroid bombardment alongside lethal levels of solar ultraviolet radiation. Deep-marine alkaline vents offered stable, sheltered sanctuaries over millions of years, insulated from the violent surface chaos that would have repeatedly sterilised any shallow terrestrial pond.

Doubts also linger regarding the validity of many laboratory simulations designed to prove hydrothermal synthesis. Over the past decade, several research teams have claimed to generate primitive metabolic cycles and peptides under replicated vent conditions. A closer inspection of their methodologies, however, reveals a recurrent flaw: these experiments routinely employ highly refined, commercially purified reagents that bear little resemblance to the chaotic mineral mixtures of the primordial seabed. Furthermore, researchers frequently intervene at crucial stages to extract intermediate compounds before they degrade, creating an artificial trajectory that nature could never have maintained. Until synthetic experiments incorporate authentic rock samples and unmanaged continuous flows, their celebrated breakthroughs must be treated with considerable scepticism.

The hydrothermal hypothesis has also heavily influenced modern astrobiology, sparking confident declarations that alien life must exist in the subsurface oceans of icy moons such as Europa and Enceladus. Because space probes have detected plumes of mineral-rich water and molecular hydrogen erupting from these worlds, many researchers take the presence of flourishing extraterrestrial biospheres for granted. I would caution against such unwarranted optimism. Detecting the chemical signatures of serpentinisation on a distant moon confirms only that water interacts with rock, not that those hydrothermal systems possess the sustained longevity, metal catalysts, or organic carbon concentrations necessary to ignite living systems.

Today, these profound geological formations face an immediate anthropogenic peril: the impending onset of commercial deep-sea mining. Industrial consortia are actively preparing to extract seafloor massive sulfide deposits, drawn by lucrative concentrations of copper, gold, and rare earth elements located at extinct and active vent fields. Some economists justify this exploitation by claiming that mining inactive chimney fields avoids damaging active biological communities. This rationale is remarkably short-sighted. Inactive vents hold irreplaceable geological archives of hydrothermal evolution and prebiotic mineralogy. Obliterating these delicate structures before we have deciphered the geochemical transition from rock to life constitutes an unforgivable act of scientific vandalism.

Questions 1–8

Do the following statements agree with the views or claims of the writer of the passage? Write YES if the statement agrees with the views of the writer NO if the statement contradicts the views of the writer NOT GIVEN if it is impossible to say what the writer thinks about this

  1. 1Black smoker vents were initially overvalued as potential sites for the emergence of living matter.

  2. 2The extreme heat of black smokers would have facilitated the formation of essential genetic molecules.

  3. 3Alkaline vents provide a more plausible environment for early bioenergetic processes than other marine sites.

  4. 4Most scientists now agree that terrestrial hot springs should be ruled out as the setting for abiogenesis.

  5. 5Surface environments on the early Earth provided safer conditions for prebiotic chemistry than deep ocean vents.

  6. 6Laboratory experiments on hydrothermal chemistry have relied on unrealistically pure chemical ingredients.

  7. 7Astrobiologists are justified in assuming that hydrothermal activity on icy moons has generated living organisms.

  8. 8Mining companies have developed techniques that minimise physical damage to inactive hydrothermal chimneys.

Ready to answer these 8 questions?

Log in to attempt this drill in the BandLadder test player, with instant scoring when you finish.

Ready for a full Reading test?

Three passages, 40 questions of every type and 60 minutes on the clock, with your band score the moment you finish. Your free account also gets AI-scored Writing and Speaking.

Take a full timed test free →

Keep practising

More Yes/No/Not Given drills

Get your band, not just a score

  • ✓Full timed Reading and Listening tests
  • ✓AI-scored Writing with band feedback
  • ✓AI-scored Speaking with an AI examiner
Take a full timed test free

Free account · no card

© 2026 BandLadder. Written and checked by the BandLadder team. You may quote or cite this page with credit to BandLadder and a link to it; republishing it in full needs our written permission. Content use policy

Log in to attempt — free