IELTS Speaking Part 3

Public speaking and communication skills: Part 3 questions and answers

Part 3 is a four-to-five-minute discussion that takes the Part 2 topic into wider ideas. Here are 5 questions on public speaking and communication skills, each with a Band 8 model answer, plus how to handle this theme and the words that lift it.
  • 5 questions
  • Band 8 model answers
  • 4 to 5 minutes

These questions follow the cue card Describe a confident public speaker you know. Do that card first for the full Part 2 to Part 3 flow.

5 questions

Questions and Band 8 answers

1

Why do so many people find speaking in front of an audience stressful?

I suppose it largely comes down to the fear of social judgment and vulnerability. When someone steps onto a stage, they become the sole focus of attention, which triggers an intense worry about making mistakes or being ridiculed. For instance, stumbling over a sentence in private is trivial, but doing so before a large crowd feels catastrophic. However, this anxiety often diminishes considerably once an individual gains regular exposure and proper training.

2

Should schools teach public speaking to all young children?

Yes, I definitely believe incorporating formal presentation skills into early education is beneficial. Developing verbal confidence early on equips children to articulate their thoughts clearly in academic and social contexts, such as presenting group projects. That said, the curriculum should focus on encouragement and constructive feedback rather than harsh grading, otherwise nervous pupils might develop an enduring aversion to speaking up.

3

How has modern technology changed the way leaders address the public?

Technology has fundamentally shifted public communication from formal, scheduled gatherings to immediate, highly scrutinised digital broadcasts. Leaders now frequently use short online video clips or live streams to connect directly with citizens, bypassing traditional journalists. While this creates a sense of direct intimacy, it also means speeches are often reduced to brief, punchy soundbites designed for viral sharing rather than nuanced debate.

4

Do you think natural charisma is more important than practice when giving a speech?

Charisma certainly gives a speaker an initial advantage because a magnetic personality instantly grabs attention. However, I’d argue that rigorous preparation is ultimately more vital. Even the most charismatic individual will lose credibility if their talk lacks structure, evidence, or clear logic. A well-rehearsed, average speaker who delivers substantive insights is usually far more informative than a charming speaker who has nothing meaningful to say.

5

In what situations might an overly persuasive speaker cause problems for society?

Eloquence can become genuinely dangerous when it is used to manipulate public sentiment or promote divisive ideologies. History shows that charismatic demagogues can sway crowds by appealing to fear and prejudice rather than rational argument. For example, during political crises, a gifted orator might convince citizens to support extreme policies. Therefore, audiences need strong critical thinking skills to evaluate the substance behind polished rhetoric.

Use the shape, not the sentences: a view, a reason, an example, a limit. Examiners mark memorised answers down.

Say your answers and get a band

The AI examiner asks Part 3 questions after your cue card, listens, and scores fluency, vocabulary, grammar and pronunciation, with the words that cost you.

Log in to practise this with AI scoring — free →

Strategy

How to discuss public speaking and communication skills

  1. 1

    Balance arguments by acknowledging the initial impact of natural talent before highlighting the value of preparation.

  2. 2

    Illustrate abstract societal risks with realistic historical or political tendencies without naming specific figures.

  3. 3

    Qualify strong recommendations by suggesting how policies like school training should be implemented sensitively.

7 words

Vocabulary for this discussion

  • diminishes

    becomes smaller, weaker, or less important

  • articulate

    express ideas clearly and fluently in speech

  • enduring aversion

    a long-lasting, strong feeling of dislike or reluctance

  • soundbites

    short, catchy extracts from a recorded speech

  • substantive

    having genuine importance, value, or solid factual basis

  • demagogues

    leaders who gain support by appealing to desires and prejudices

  • rhetoric

    the art of persuasive speaking, sometimes lacking sincere substance

Frequently asked questions

How long should a Part 3 answer be?+

Usually four to six sentences, or 30 to 60 seconds. Give a clear view, a reason, an example and, where it fits, a limit or an exception. The examiner will interrupt if you go on too long, which is normal.

Does Part 3 follow the cue card?+

Yes. Part 3 takes the theme of your Part 2 card and makes it abstract: society, comparisons, causes and the future. These questions follow the card "Describe a confident public speaker you know".

Can I say I don't know?+

You can say you haven't thought about it much, but then give your best guess with a reason. Examiners score your language, not your knowledge.

Keep practising

More Part 3 discussions: a person

© 2026 BandLadder. Written and checked by the BandLadder team. You may quote or cite this page with credit to BandLadder and a link to it; republishing it in full needs our written permission. Content use policy

Log in to practise free