1
Why do many modern cities choose to construct tall buildings?
Primarily, it comes down to land scarcity and surging population density in urban centres. Building upwards allows planners to maximise limited ground space, accommodating thousands of offices or residential flats on a relatively compact footprint. For example, megacities like Hong Kong or London rely heavily on high-rises to house booming commercial sectors. That said, sheer prestige also plays a part, as iconic skyscrapers often serve as international status symbols for ambitious cities.
2
What are the main disadvantages of living or working in high-rise buildings?
One major drawback is the feeling of isolation and detachment from outdoor green spaces. People spending their entire day dozens of storeys above ground often miss out on casual community interactions. Additionally, practical disruptions can be a headache; for instance, if a lift breaks down or during a fire evacuation, navigating dozens of flights of stairs is exhausting. However, modern building management and indoor communal amenities have somewhat mitigated these inconveniences.
3
How has urban architecture changed compared to the past?
Traditionally, buildings were constructed using local materials like stone, timber, or brick, reflecting regional heritage and craftsmanship. In contrast, modern architecture is dominated by steel, concrete, and reflective glass, focusing on functional efficiency and minimalism. For instance, contemporary financial districts across the globe now look remarkably uniform. Nonetheless, some modern architects are beginning to reintroduce sustainable timber and vertical greenery to soften this somewhat sterile aesthetic.
4
Should governments preserve historic low-rise areas rather than building skyscrapers?
I definitely believe safeguarding cultural heritage should take precedence over unconstrained commercial development. Historic neighbourhoods give a city its unique identity, character, and cultural roots, which, once demolished, can never truly be replaced. A classic example would be European city centres like Rome or Edinburgh, where strict zoning prevents high-rises from encroaching on historic sites. Even so, local authorities must strike a balance to ensure housing demands are met elsewhere.
5
What do you think cities of the future will look like?
I imagine future cities will be far more integrated, sustainable, and multi-layered than they are today. Rather than separate residential and commercial zones, we will likely see self-contained vertical neighbourhoods with integrated renewable energy, urban farms, and automated transport hubs. For example, some conceptual developments are already linking towers with sky-bridges to reduce ground-level congestion. Of course, whether these high-tech designs become widespread depends heavily on global economic stability.
Use the shape, not the sentences: a view, a reason, an example, a limit. Examiners mark memorised answers down.