Writing Task 2 · Opinion (agree or disagree)

Technological progress and the wealth gap: to what extent: IELTS Writing Task 2 sample answer

An IELTS Writing Task 2 opinion essay question with a Band 8-style sample answer, the plan behind it, the vocabulary that lifts it and what an examiner looks for.
  • 276 words
  • Opinion (agree or disagree)
  • General Training
  • 40 minutes

The question

Technological progress is increasing the gap between rich and poor. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

About 40 minutes. Write at least 250 words.

Opinion (agree or disagree)

Plan before you write

  1. 1

    Your position

    I largely agree that modern technological advancements exacerbate economic disparities by concentrating wealth and marginalising low-skilled workers.

  2. 2

    Paragraph 2

    Technological innovation tends to favour capital owners and highly skilled professionals, leading to a concentration of wealth.

  3. 3

    Paragraph 3

    The digital divide prevents disadvantaged populations from accessing the tools required to compete in a modern economy.

  • →State a clear position in the introduction and develop it consistently throughout the essay.
  • →One useful approach is to develop a main reason in each body paragraph, supported by explanation or an example.
  • →A qualified or partial agreement is fine when its limits are clear and supported.

Model answer

Band 8-style sample essay

This AI-generated teaching example illustrates target features; it has not received an official IELTS band. Compare its ideas and structure with your own response.

Band 8-style model276 words · use the structure and vocabulary, not the sentences

The rapid evolution of technology has become a defining feature of contemporary life, yet it has also triggered significant concerns regarding social inequality. I believe that technological progress is a primary driver behind the widening chasm between the wealthy and the impoverished, as it disproportionately rewards those with existing capital and advanced expertise.

Technological innovation primarily benefits those who own the means of production, such as software developers and large corporations, rather than the average labourer. When companies automate processes through artificial intelligence or sophisticated robotics, they often reduce their reliance on human labour, thereby decreasing operational costs and inflating profit margins for shareholders. For instance, the rise of e-commerce giants has decimated traditional retail jobs while funnelling immense wealth into the hands of a few tech-savvy entrepreneurs, further entrenching the financial divide.

Furthermore, the digital divide serves as a persistent barrier that prevents lower-income individuals from participating in the modern economy. Access to high-speed internet, expensive hardware, and specialised digital training is often restricted to those who can afford it, leaving marginalised groups behind. For example, students in affluent districts frequently benefit from advanced educational technology that prepares them for high-paying roles, whereas their counterparts in poorer areas suffer from a lack of resources, effectively limiting their future earning potential and perpetuating cycles of poverty.

In essence, while innovation drives human development, it currently functions as a mechanism that amplifies economic stratification. By concentrating financial gains among a small elite and restricting access to vital tools for the underprivileged, technology has exacerbated existing inequalities. Addressing this imbalance requires systemic intervention to ensure the benefits of progress are distributed more equitably across all strata of society.

Model commentary

Features to notice in this model

This model aims to illustrate Band 8 features by consistently linking technology to specific economic mechanisms, such as capital concentration and the digital divide, rather than making vague generalizations. A Band 6 response often fails to answer the 'to what extent' prompt clearly and relies on repetitive, simplistic vocabulary regarding technology being 'good' or 'bad'.

Now write it yourself, against the clock

Forty minutes, then paste your essay into the free writing checker: a band for task response, coherence, vocabulary and grammar from BandLadder AI, with every mistake marked. Try AI feedback before signup.

Check my essay free →

8 words

Vocabulary from the essay

  • exacerbate

    make a problem or bad situation much worse

  • chasm

    a profound difference or division between two things

  • disproportionately

    to an extent that is too large or small

  • entrenching

    establishing something so firmly that it cannot change

  • marginalised

    treated as insignificant or peripheral to society

  • stratification

    the arrangement of something into different social layers

  • equitably

    in a fair and impartial manner for all

  • affluent

    having a great deal of money or wealth

More words for this topic: IELTS vocabulary for technology.

Frequently asked questions

What type of essay is "Technological progress and the wealth gap: to what extent"?+

Opinion (agree or disagree). State a clear position in the introduction and develop it consistently throughout the essay.

How many words should an IELTS Writing Task 2 essay be?+

At least 250 words, in about 40 minutes. This sample is 276 words, written to fit that time with five minutes left to check grammar.

How is IELTS Writing Task 2 scored?+

On four criteria: task response, coherence and cohesion, vocabulary, and grammatical range and accuracy. Task 2 counts for twice as much as Task 1 in your Writing band.

What is the difference between a Band 6 and a Band 8 answer here?+

This model aims to illustrate Band 8 features by consistently linking technology to specific economic mechanisms, such as capital concentration and the digital divide, rather than making vague generalizations. A Band 6 response often fails to answer the 'to what extent' prompt clearly and relies on repetitive, simplistic vocabulary regarding technology being 'good' or 'bad'.

Keep practising

More sample essays

© 2026 BandLadder. Written and checked by the BandLadder team. You may quote or cite this page with credit to BandLadder and a link to it; republishing it in full needs our written permission. Content use policy