Data access by technology companies: discuss both views
The question
Some people believe that technology companies should have access to personal data to improve their services, while others think this violates privacy rights. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
About 40 minutes. Write at least 250 words.
Plan before you write
- Position:
- While data-driven improvements enhance user experience, I believe the fundamental right to privacy must take precedence, necessitating stricter regulatory oversight.
- Paragraph 2:
- Corporations argue that harvesting personal information is essential to tailor services and innovate effectively.
- Paragraph 3:
- Critics maintain that unrestricted data collection threatens individual autonomy and creates significant security vulnerabilities.
- Give each view its own paragraph, explained fairly even where you disagree.
- Say where you stand in the introduction and again in the conclusion; the question asks for your opinion.
- Do not merge the two views into one paragraph; examiners look for both to be developed.
Band 8 sample essay
The debate regarding whether technology firms should be permitted to access personal data is a contentious issue. While proponents argue this practice is necessary for the evolution of digital services, opponents contend that it represents an unacceptable infringement on individual privacy. In my view, although data analytics offer clear functional benefits, the risks to personal security and autonomy are too significant to ignore, requiring more robust legislative frameworks.
Advocates for data access highlight the necessity of information to refine user experiences. By analysing behaviour, companies can provide personalised recommendations, streamline interfaces, and develop more intuitive software. For example, streaming platforms like Netflix utilise viewing history to suggest content, which significantly enhances user satisfaction and engagement. From this perspective, the seamless integration of technology into daily life is contingent upon the availability of user data to fuel machine learning algorithms.
Conversely, many argue that this practice facilitates the systematic erosion of privacy. The potential for data to be misused, leaked, or sold to third parties poses a severe threat to individuals. A pertinent example of this is the Cambridge Analytica scandal, where personal data was harvested without explicit consent to influence political sentiment. Such incidents demonstrate that when corporations prioritise profit over data protection, the trust between the service provider and the consumer is fundamentally compromised, leading to profound societal concerns.
In summary, while the optimisation of services through data collection is a clear advantage of modern technology, the preservation of privacy remains a paramount concern. I believe that strict regulations are required to ensure that technological progress does not come at the cost of civil liberties. Companies must be held accountable, ensuring transparency and user consent remain the foundations of any data-driven innovation.
283 words. Use the structure and the vocabulary, not the sentences.
Why this scores Band 8
This essay achieves Band 8 by providing a clear, consistent position throughout and supporting it with relevant, well-developed examples. A Band 6 response often fails to address both sides of the argument equally or relies on vague, generalised statements instead of specific, illustrative examples.
Vocabulary from the essay
- contentious
- causing or likely to cause an argument
- infringement
- the action of breaking the terms of rights
- contingent upon
- subject to chance or dependent on something else
- systematic erosion
- the gradual and planned destruction of something
- pertinent
- relevant or applicable to a particular matter
- compromised
- weakened or put in a dangerous situation
- paramount
- more important than anything else in importance
- civil liberties
- the rights of citizens to political freedom
Write this one yourself and get a band
Forty minutes, then a band for task response, coherence, vocabulary and grammar, with the sentences that cost you marked.
Practise IELTS writingOn your phone? Get the BandLadder app for scored writing practice anywhere.
Frequently asked questions
What type of essay is "Data access by technology companies: discuss both views"?
Discussion (both views and your opinion). Give each view its own paragraph, explained fairly even where you disagree.
How long should the answer be?
At least 250 words. This sample is 283 words, written to fit 40 minutes with five minutes left to check grammar.
What is the difference between a Band 6 and a Band 8 answer here?
This essay achieves Band 8 by providing a clear, consistent position throughout and supporting it with relevant, well-developed examples. A Band 6 response often fails to address both sides of the argument equally or relies on vague, generalised statements instead of specific, illustrative examples.
More sample essays
- Are video games beneficial for children: agree or disagree
- Artificial Intelligence and Job Displacement: Discuss Both Views
- Genetically modified crops: advantages and disadvantages of food technology
- Has technology simplified or complicated human existence: discuss both views
- Is genetic engineering a threat to human existence?
- Celebrity salaries versus essential workers: discuss both views
- Choosing a career: salary versus job satisfaction discussion
- Compulsory community service in schools: discuss both views
- All 148 sample essays