Writing Task 2 · Two-part question

Declining bicycle usage: causes and potential solutions: IELTS Writing Task 2 sample answer

An IELTS Writing Task 2 two-part question essay question with a Band 8-style sample answer, the plan behind it, the vocabulary that lifts it and what an examiner looks for.
  • 275 words
  • Two-part question
  • Academic
  • 40 minutes

The question

Nowadays people use bicycles less as a form of transport. Why is this the case? What can we do to encourage people to use bicycles more?

About 40 minutes. Write at least 250 words.

Two-part question

Plan before you write

  1. 1

    Your position

    The decline in cycling stems from urban prioritisation of motor vehicles and safety concerns, which can be mitigated through infrastructure development and public incentives.

  2. 2

    Paragraph 2

    The primary reason for reduced bicycle usage is the prioritisation of car-centric urban design and the subsequent safety risks for cyclists.

  3. 3

    Paragraph 3

    Governments can reverse this trend by investing in segregated cycle lanes and offering financial incentives for commuters.

  • →Answer both questions directly and develop each answer.
  • →One useful structure is a body paragraph for each question, using clear topic sentences and relevant support.
  • →Check that neither requested part is omitted or replaced with an answer to a different question.

Model answer

Band 8-style sample essay

This AI-generated teaching example illustrates target features; it has not received an official IELTS band. Compare its ideas and structure with your own response.

Band 8-style model275 words · use the structure and vocabulary, not the sentences

The prevalence of cycling as a primary mode of transport has witnessed a significant decline in recent decades. This trend is largely attributable to the rapid expansion of motorised transport systems and a growing perception of road danger, which necessitates strategic urban planning and policy interventions to rectify.

One fundamental cause for this shift is the dominance of automobiles in modern infrastructure. Urban landscapes are increasingly designed to facilitate high-speed vehicular traffic, often at the expense of non-motorised transit. Consequently, cyclists frequently find themselves navigating congested routes that lack physical separation from heavy traffic, leading to valid concerns regarding personal safety. For instance, in many major cities, the absence of protected lanes discourages casual commuters, who may perceive sharing the road with lorries and buses as an unnecessarily hazardous endeavour.

To reverse this decline, local authorities must prioritise the development of comprehensive cycling networks. By constructing segregated paths that are physically demarcated from main roads, cities can foster a safer environment that encourages broader participation. Furthermore, economic incentives play a crucial role in changing commuter behaviour. Implementing tax breaks for employees who cycle to work, or subsidising the purchase of e-bikes, can lower the barriers to entry. A successful example of this approach is found in Copenhagen, where extensive investment in dedicated cycling bridges and parking facilities has maintained high levels of bicycle usage despite the availability of public transport.

In summary, the move away from bicycles is primarily a consequence of car-orientated urban design and safety apprehensions. By committing to robust infrastructure improvements and targeted financial support, governments can effectively restore cycling as a viable and preferred method of transportation for the general population.

Model commentary

Features to notice in this model

This model aims to illustrate Band 8 features by directly addressing both parts of the prompt with clear, logical arguments and precise vocabulary. A Band 6 response often fails to provide concrete examples or relies on repetitive, generic advice without linking it to the specific causes mentioned.

Now write it yourself, against the clock

Forty minutes, then paste your essay into the free writing checker: a band for task response, coherence, vocabulary and grammar from BandLadder AI, with every mistake marked. Try AI feedback before signup.

Check my essay free →

8 words

Vocabulary from the essay

  • motorised

    equipped with a motor or engine for movement

  • prioritisation

    the action of treating something as more important

  • infrastructure

    the basic physical systems of a city region

  • segregated

    kept apart from others by physical barriers

  • demarcated

    set the boundaries or limits of something clearly

  • endeavour

    a serious attempt to achieve a specific goal

  • subsidising

    supporting financially to reduce the final cost

  • apprehensions

    feelings of anxiety or fear about future events

More words for this topic: IELTS vocabulary for society.

Frequently asked questions

What type of essay is "Declining bicycle usage: causes and potential solutions"?+

Two-part question. Answer both questions directly and develop each answer.

How many words should an IELTS Writing Task 2 essay be?+

At least 250 words, in about 40 minutes. This sample is 275 words, written to fit that time with five minutes left to check grammar.

How is IELTS Writing Task 2 scored?+

On four criteria: task response, coherence and cohesion, vocabulary, and grammatical range and accuracy. Task 2 counts for twice as much as Task 1 in your Writing band.

What is the difference between a Band 6 and a Band 8 answer here?+

This model aims to illustrate Band 8 features by directly addressing both parts of the prompt with clear, logical arguments and precise vocabulary. A Band 6 response often fails to provide concrete examples or relies on repetitive, generic advice without linking it to the specific causes mentioned.

Keep practising

More sample essays

© 2026 BandLadder. Written and checked by the BandLadder team. You may quote or cite this page with credit to BandLadder and a link to it; republishing it in full needs our written permission. Content use policy