Communicating with extraterrestrial life: discuss both views
The question
Some scientists think that there are intelligent life forms on other planets and messages should be sent to contact them. Other scientists think it is a bad idea and would be dangerous. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. (2017, 2022)
About 40 minutes. Write at least 250 words.
Plan before you write
- Position:
- I believe that the risks associated with broadcasting our existence to the cosmos far outweigh the potential benefits of such contact.
- Paragraph 2:
- Proponents argue that establishing communication with advanced civilisations could provide humanity with unprecedented scientific and philosophical knowledge.
- Paragraph 3:
- Conversely, many experts warn that revealing our location to potentially hostile entities could lead to catastrophic consequences for our species.
- Give each view its own paragraph, explained fairly even where you disagree.
- Say where you stand in the introduction and again in the conclusion; the question asks for your opinion.
- Do not merge the two views into one paragraph; examiners look for both to be developed.
Band 8 sample essay
The possibility of intelligent life elsewhere in the universe has long fascinated humanity. While some researchers advocate for actively transmitting signals to initiate contact, others caution against such measures due to the inherent risks involved. This essay will examine both perspectives and argue that remaining silent is the more prudent course of action.
Those who support reaching out to extraterrestrial civilisations often emphasise the immense intellectual rewards such interaction could offer. The discovery of an advanced society might provide answers to profound scientific questions or provide solutions to complex global challenges, such as sustainable energy or space travel. For instance, the SETI Institute has historically used radio telescopes to listen for signals, and proponents suggest that sending messages could accelerate a collaborative exchange of knowledge that would leapfrog centuries of human progress.
However, this optimistic outlook is countered by concerns regarding the potential dangers of announcing our presence. If an alien civilisation possesses significantly superior technology, they may view Earth as a resource to be exploited or a threat to be neutralised. This perspective is famously shared by renowned physicists like Stephen Hawking, who warned that humanity would be ill-equipped to handle a visit from a technologically dominant species. A historical parallel can be seen in human exploration on Earth, where encounters between civilisations with disparate technological levels have frequently resulted in the subjugation or destruction of the less advanced group.
In summary, while the allure of contacting extraterrestrial life is compelling from a scientific standpoint, the existential risks are too significant to ignore. I maintain that humanity should prioritise internal development and caution over the reckless broadcasting of our location, as the consequences of an unfriendly encounter remain an unpredictable and potentially fatal variable.
285 words. Use the structure and the vocabulary, not the sentences.
Why this scores Band 8
This essay achieves Band 8 by addressing the prompt with a clear, logical progression and sophisticated vocabulary that enhances the argument. A Band 6 answer typically fails to provide a clear opinion or relies on repetitive, simplistic language that does not effectively explore the risks and benefits.
Vocabulary from the essay
- extraterrestrial
- originating or existing outside the planet Earth
- prudent
- acting with or showing care for the future
- unprecedented
- never having happened or existed in the past
- leapfrog
- to improve or advance by passing over others
- neutralised
- rendered ineffective or harmless by some force
- disparate
- essentially different in kind and not comparable
- subjugation
- the action of bringing someone under total control
- existential
- relating to existence or the survival of life
Write this one yourself and get a band
Forty minutes, then a band for task response, coherence, vocabulary and grammar, with the sentences that cost you marked.
Practise IELTS writingOn your phone? Get the BandLadder app for scored writing practice anywhere.
Frequently asked questions
What type of essay is "Communicating with extraterrestrial life: discuss both views"?
Discussion (both views and your opinion). Give each view its own paragraph, explained fairly even where you disagree.
How long should the answer be?
At least 250 words. This sample is 285 words, written to fit 40 minutes with five minutes left to check grammar.
What is the difference between a Band 6 and a Band 8 answer here?
This essay achieves Band 8 by addressing the prompt with a clear, logical progression and sophisticated vocabulary that enhances the argument. A Band 6 answer typically fails to provide a clear opinion or relies on repetitive, simplistic language that does not effectively explore the risks and benefits.
More sample essays
- Are video games beneficial for children: agree or disagree
- Artificial Intelligence and Job Displacement: Discuss Both Views
- Data access by technology companies: discuss both views
- E-books versus traditional paper books: discuss both views
- Genetically modified crops: advantages and disadvantages of food technology
- Celebrity salaries versus essential workers: discuss both views
- Choosing a career: salary versus job satisfaction discussion
- Compulsory community service in schools: discuss both views
- All 180 sample essays