Government funding for space exploration: discuss both views
The question
Some people want governments to spend money looking for life on other planets. Others, however, think this is a waste of public money when there are so many problems on earth. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
About 40 minutes. Write at least 250 words.
Plan before you write
- Position:
- While addressing terrestrial crises is a priority, I believe investing in space exploration provides long-term scientific benefits that justify its cost.
- Paragraph 2:
- Proponents of space research argue that seeking extraterrestrial life pushes the boundaries of human knowledge and fosters technological innovation.
- Paragraph 3:
- Conversely, critics maintain that allocating public funds to space missions is unjustifiable while issues like poverty and climate change remain unresolved.
- Give each view its own paragraph, explained fairly even where you disagree.
- Say where you stand in the introduction and again in the conclusion; the question asks for your opinion.
- Do not merge the two views into one paragraph; examiners look for both to be developed.
Band 8 sample essay
The debate over whether governments should allocate financial resources to search for life on other planets has intensified in recent years. While some argue that such pursuits are an extravagant misuse of taxpayers' money, others contend that space exploration is a vital endeavour for humanity's future. This essay will examine both perspectives before arguing that funding space research is a justifiable investment.
Supporters of space exploration highlight that the quest to find life beyond Earth drives significant scientific and technological progress. The rigorous requirements of deep-space missions often necessitate innovations that eventually benefit society in tangible ways. For instance, the development of satellite communications and advanced medical imaging technologies originated from research initially intended for space programmes. By pushing the frontiers of what is possible, space agencies foster a culture of scientific advancement that has positive ripple effects across various domestic industries.
On the other hand, many taxpayers argue that public funds should be prioritised for urgent domestic problems, such as homelessness, healthcare, and environmental degradation. From this viewpoint, it is unethical to spend billions on searching for distant life forms when millions on Earth lack basic necessities. A pertinent example is the ongoing global climate crisis, which requires immense financial commitment to mitigate; critics suggest that if these funds were redirected from space exploration to renewable energy projects, the planet would be far closer to achieving sustainability.
In my view, although domestic issues require immediate attention, the pursuit of extraterrestrial knowledge is not mutually exclusive with solving earthly problems. A balanced budget can support essential social services while simultaneously investing in the long-term potential of space research. Ultimately, humanity thrives when it maintains a focus on both immediate survival and future discovery.
283 words. Use the structure and the vocabulary, not the sentences.
Why this scores Band 8
This essay achieves Band 8 by maintaining a clear, consistent position throughout and providing balanced, logically developed arguments with relevant examples. A Band 6 answer typically fails to address both sides equally or relies on clichéd generalisations without providing specific, illustrative examples.
Vocabulary from the essay
- extravagant
- Lacking restraint in spending money or using resources
- endeavour
- An attempt to achieve a goal or objective
- tangible
- Perceptible by touch or clearly real and concrete
- ripple effects
- Continuing and spreading results of an event
- mitigate
- Make something less severe, serious, or painful
- mutually exclusive
- Two things that cannot both be true simultaneously
- prioritised
- Designated as more important than other things
- sustainability
- Avoiding depletion of natural resources to maintain balance
Write this one yourself and get a band
Forty minutes, then a band for task response, coherence, vocabulary and grammar, with the sentences that cost you marked.
Practise IELTS writingOn your phone? Get the BandLadder app for scored writing practice anywhere.
Frequently asked questions
What type of essay is "Government funding for space exploration: discuss both views"?
Discussion (both views and your opinion). Give each view its own paragraph, explained fairly even where you disagree.
How long should the answer be?
At least 250 words. This sample is 283 words, written to fit 40 minutes with five minutes left to check grammar.
What is the difference between a Band 6 and a Band 8 answer here?
This essay achieves Band 8 by maintaining a clear, consistent position throughout and providing balanced, logically developed arguments with relevant examples. A Band 6 answer typically fails to address both sides equally or relies on clichéd generalisations without providing specific, illustrative examples.
More sample essays
- Government funding for space exploration: discuss both views
- Government influence on personal lifestyle choices: to what extent
- Public transport investment: speed versus affordability and service
- Artificial Intelligence and Job Displacement: Discuss Both Views
- Celebrity salaries versus essential workers: discuss both views
- Choosing a career: salary versus job satisfaction discussion
- All 148 sample essays