Robotic vacuum cleaners are already common, and engineers are developing machines that can fold clothes and prepare simple meals. If robots eventually take over most household chores, I believe this would be a largely positive change, although it carries some risks that should not be ignored.
The clearest benefit is the time it would release. Housework takes up several hours a week in most homes, and this burden still falls disproportionately on women in many societies. If a machine handled cleaning and laundry, family members could spend that time resting, studying or simply being together. Robots could also transform the lives of people who struggle with physical tasks. An elderly person living alone, for instance, might be able to stay in their own home for years longer if a robot could lift heavy baskets, load the washing machine and remind them to eat. This would not only improve their quality of life but also reduce pressure on care services.
There are, admittedly, drawbacks. Early models are likely to be expensive, so the benefits would at first be enjoyed mainly by wealthier households. There is also a concern that children who grow up with robots will never learn to cook or keep a home tidy, leaving them helpless if the technology fails. However, prices for most technologies fall steadily over time, as happened with dishwashers and washing machines. As for skills, parents and schools can still teach young people to cook and clean, just as children learn mental arithmetic even though calculators exist.
Overall, I consider the spread of domestic robots to be a positive development. As long as families make a conscious effort to keep basic practical skills alive, the gains in free time and independence would be substantial.